Neo-Victorian Biofiction and the Special/Spectral Case of Barbara Chase-Riboud’s Hottentot Venus
Keywords:
appropriation, auto/biofiction, Sarah Baartman, Barbara Chase-Riboud, Hottentot Venus, life-writing, neo-Victorian, the Other, spectrality, subjectivityAbstract
Although the term “biofiction” is regularly employed in neo-Victorian criticism it remains curiously under-theorised, without extended discussion of writers’ different approaches to the fictional re-imaginings of nineteenth-century historical subjects, or such representations’ varied ethical or ethically suspect implications. This paper identifies a range of descriptive modes – “celebrity biofiction,” “biofiction of marginalised subjects” and “appropriated biofiction” – to begin to map this neo-Victorian subgenre in greater detail. Barbara Chase-Riboud’s Hottentot Venus (2003) is considered as a biofictional case-study and limit-case of bearing after-witness to an historical Other.Downloads
Published
2013-11-28
Issue
Section
Articles
License
The copyright for articles in this journal is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use with proper attribution in educational and other non-commercial sectors.How to Cite
Kohlke, M.-L. (2013). Neo-Victorian Biofiction and the Special/Spectral Case of Barbara Chase-Riboud’s Hottentot Venus. Australasian Journal of Victorian Studies, 18(3), 4-21. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/AJVS/article/view/9382