Neo-Victorian Biofiction and the Special/Spectral Case of Barbara Chase-Riboud’s Hottentot Venus

Authors

  • Marie-Luise Kohlke

Keywords:

appropriation, auto/biofiction, Sarah Baartman, Barbara Chase-Riboud, Hottentot Venus, life-writing, neo-Victorian, the Other, spectrality, subjectivity

Abstract

Although the term “biofiction” is regularly employed in neo-Victorian criticism it remains curiously under-theorised, without extended discussion of writers’ different approaches to the fictional re-imaginings of nineteenth-century historical subjects, or such representations’ varied ethical or ethically suspect implications. This paper identifies a range of descriptive modes – “celebrity biofiction,” “biofiction of marginalised subjects” and “appropriated biofiction” – to begin to map this neo-Victorian subgenre in greater detail. Barbara Chase-Riboud’s Hottentot Venus (2003) is considered as a biofictional case-study and limit-case of bearing after-witness to an historical Other.

Downloads

Published

2013-11-28

How to Cite

Kohlke, M.-L. (2013). Neo-Victorian Biofiction and the Special/Spectral Case of Barbara Chase-Riboud’s Hottentot Venus. Australasian Journal of Victorian Studies, 18(3), 4-21. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/AJVS/article/view/9382