The door is ajar—response to ‘Project management: a profession with a hole in its head or, why a change in the culture of academic support is needed for the profession’

Authors

  • GARY D. HOLT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2014.947270

Keywords:

Academic knowledge, knowledge stakeholders, opinion, PM competence

Abstract

A personal view (response) is offered to three themes discussed within Morris [(2014) ‘Project management: a profession with a hole in its head’ or, why a change in the culture of academic support is needed for the profession’, The Engineering Project Organization Journal, available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10. 1080/21573727.2013.873717 (published online, January, 2014)]. Specific themes responded to are: conceptual academic activity; the integrative function of academia in researching and delivering project management (PM) knowledge and stakeholders’ responsibilities for developing experiential PM competence.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
“The door is ajar—response to ‘Project management: a profession with a hole in its head or, why a change in the culture of academic support is needed for the profession’”, EPOJ, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 5, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1080/21573727.2014.947270.