Teacher workload and intensifying demands: Lessons from the Chinese double reduction policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70830/iejcp.2302.20358Abstract
The 2018 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) results revealed a negative correlation between student academic achievement and wellbeing, indicating that higher academic performance often coincides with lower student well-being. In response to these findings and the broader issues within the Chinese education system, the Double Reduction Policy was introduced in July 2021 to reduce the volume of homework and limit the scope of off-campus subject-based tutoring.
This article aims to examine the impact and challenges of this policy within a school by employing semi-structured interviews to gather qualitative data from various stakeholders, including the teachers, students, and parents. This study identified several key findings and challenges, such as inadequacy in the quantity and quality of after-school services provided; the current teacher renumeration system, which is unclear and causes uncertainty and stress among teachers; and a mismatch between the expectations of parents and the goals of the double reduction policy.
This study employs the network governance theory and Mohe under the concept of Asia as method to understand how teachers and other stakeholders manage and allocate resources to adapt to the new policy requirements. Resource dependent theory suggests that teachers are willing to collaborate and share their resources to enhance students' learning experiences, despite potential personal and professional sacrifices. This article argues for better after-school services, improved homework setting practices, a clear teacher evaluation system, and alignment of parental expectations with policy goals. It suggests leveraging off-campus resources and fostering collaborative efforts among stakeholders to overcome these challenges. Additionally, a shift from an exam-oriented educational system to a more holistic approach is necessary to address the underlying issues affecting student well-being and academic achievement in China.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Grace Xuecong Ji, Philip Wing Keung Chan, Penelope Kalogeropoulos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives is the official journal of the Oceania Comparative and International Education Society. The IEJ, (ISSN 1443-1475), publishes a general volume bi-annually in July and December and also publishes Special Editions occasionally. It is a free, open-access scholarly journal, managed by volunteers. There are no article processing charges, or any charges to authors.
In relation to intellectual property, as of 2020, the IEJ: CP claims only first publication rights; copyright of all work published in the journal remains with the authors under Creative Commons copyright license CC-BY-ND (4.0). Author(s) retain all rights to their works, ensuring that reference to the International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives is clearly stated on any copies made or distribution. Submissions must not involve third parties with a claim to copyright, and be the sole work of the author(s). It is the responsibility of the author(s) to secure permission to reproduce photographs, illustrations, figures or tables. Single images, tables or figures can be re-used . If more than a single image or table are to be re-used authors must attribute first publication to IEJ: CP notify the IEJ: CP Editor. Authors may also make derivative works which are subject to these limitations.
See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ for more detail.
Re-distributed or used material must be referenced to the International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives.