Comparing and Contrasting Primary school playgrounds in Turkey and Australia
Keywords:
school playgrounds, outdoor play, playground rulesAbstract
This collaborative study aims to investigate aspects of school playgrounds in the city of Denizli, Turkey and in the state of Victoria, Australia. Using a survey designed for a recent study in Victoria, data was collected from a large number of schools in both settings and analysed in light of international research findings. The most significant differences between playgrounds in both contexts are related to the age of schools, involvement of local communities in their school playground, enforcement of playground rules and the natural features in the playgrounds. A number of shared challenges have emerged from this study such as involvement of children in decision making in playground design, processes for playground rule making, provision of loose parts for play, increasing natural features in playgrounds, maintaining playspaces and increasing teacher understanding of the learning that occurs when children play freely.
References
Aksoy, Y. (2001). The Determination of exciting green area situation Istanbul. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Istanbul Technical University.
Aksu, Ö. V., Demirel, Ö. and Bektaş, N. (2011). A research on site street furniture of city primary school gardens in Trabzon. Inonu University Journal of Art and Design, 1 (3), 243-254.
Australian Bureau of Statistics, Retrieved March 17, 2011, from http://www.abs.gov.au
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Data analysis manuel. [Turkish]. Ankara: Pegem A Publisher.
Chakravarthi, S. (2009). Preschool teachers’ beliefs and practices of outdoor play and outdoor environments. Doctoral thesis, University of North Carolina.
Chancellor, B. (2007). The changing face of play in Australian primary school playgrounds. Unpublished doctoral thesis, RMIT University.
Chancellor, B. (2011). The primary school playground: A place of possibilities for environmental education, Unpublished manuscript, Melbourne: RMIT University.
Chancellor, B. (2012). Primary school playgrounds: Features and management in Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Play, Taylor & Francis, (Under review).
Cevher-Kalburan, N. and Yurt, Ö. (July 7-9, 2011). School playgrounds as learning environments: Early childhood teachers’ beliefs and practices. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Education. INEAG, Samos-Greece.
Common Threads project Playtime! 2 (September 11, 2012). Retrieved from http://www.commonthreads.org.uk
Danks, S. G. (2010). Asphalt to ecosystmens: Design ideas for schoolyard transformation. Oakland, CA: New Village Press.
Erdem, A. R. (2005). Historical development and present situation of our primary education. University and Society, 5 (2). [Online]. http://www.universite-toplum.org/pdf/240.pdf [2012, May, 2]
Evans, J. (2003). The slow suffocation of play. Prime Focus, 33, 39-41.
Evans, J. (1995). Conflict and control in the school playground. Changing Education, 2(1/2): 17- 24.
Fjørtoft, I. and Sageie, J. (2000). The natural environment as a playground for children. landscape description and analyses of a natural playscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48, 83–97.
Frost, Joe L. (2008). What’s wrong with America’s playgrounds and how to fix them: An interview with. American Journal of Play, 1(2).139-156. [Online] http://www.journalofplay.org/sites/www.journalofplay.org/files/pdf-articles/1-2-interview-whats-wrong-with-americas-playgrounds-joe-frost.pdf [Retrieved August 18, 2012]
Kelkit, A. & Özel, A. E. (2003). A research on the determination of physical planning of school gardens in Canakkale City. Pakistan Journal of Applied Sciences, 3(4): 240-246.
MEB Mevzuat (2012). Retrieved from http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/225_0.html
Muhacir, E. S. A. and Özalp, A. Y. (2011). Determination of quality and quantify for primary schoolyards in Artvin city center by using geographical information system. ACU Faculty of Foresty Journal, 12(2), 172-184.
Nicholson, S. (1971). How not to cheat children: The theory of loose parts. Landscape Architecture, 62 (1), 30-35.
Önder, S. (2011). The evaluation of playgrounds of Balikesir city. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 8(3), 69-80.
Sanoff, H. (1995). Creating environments for young children. Raleigh, NC: School of Design at North Carolina State University.
Sciarra, D. J., Dorsey, A. G. and Lynch, E. (2009). Developing and administrating a child care and education program. USA: Wadsworth Cengace Learning.
Şişman, E. E. and Gültürk, P. (2011). A research on primary schoolyards in terms of landscape planing and design: Tekirdag. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 8(3), 53-60.
Smith, P. K. (2010). Children and play. UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Tanrıverdi, B. (2009). Analyzing primary school curriculum in terms of sustainable environmental education. Education and Science, 34(151), 89-103.
The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia, Available at http://www.deewr.gov.au, Retrieved (June 21, 2012)
The Playtime Project, Common Threads, U.K. Available at www.commonthreads.org.uk.
The Victorian Early Years Learning and Development Framework Retrieved ????? from http://www.education.vi.gov.au
Waller, T. (2005) ‘This is the way we go to the park!’ Recording and evaluating young children’s knowledge and perspectives of geography. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference (BERA), September.
White, R. and Stoecklin, V. (1998). Children’s outdoor play & learning environments: Returning to nature. Early Childhood News, March/April.
Wood, E. (2012). The state of play. International Journal of Play, 1 (1), 4-5.
World Education Encyclopaedia (2002). Rebecca Marlow-Ferguson (Ed.). Vol, 3. USA: Gale Group.
Yilmaz, S. and Bulut, Z. (2003); The importance of playgrounds for children in urban areas: Sample of Erzurum. National Education, 158.
http://www.mediastatements.wa.gov.au/Pages/WACabinetMinisters, Retrieved 20/7/2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives is the official journal of the Oceania Comparative and International Education Society. The IEJ, (ISSN 1443-1475), publishes a general volume bi-annually in July and December and also publishes Special Editions occasionally. It is a free, open-access scholarly journal, managed by volunteers. There are no article processing charges, or any charges to authors.
In relation to intellectual property, as of 2020, the IEJ: CP claims only first publication rights; copyright of all work published in the journal remains with the authors under Creative Commons copyright license CC-BY-ND (4.0). Author(s) retain all rights to their works, ensuring that reference to the International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives is clearly stated on any copies made or distribution. Submissions must not involve third parties with a claim to copyright, and be the sole work of the author(s). It is the responsibility of the author(s) to secure permission to reproduce photographs, illustrations, figures or tables. Single images, tables or figures can be re-used . If more than a single image or table are to be re-used authors must attribute first publication to IEJ: CP notify the IEJ: CP Editor. Authors may also make derivative works which are subject to these limitations.
See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ for more detail.
Re-distributed or used material must be referenced to the International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives.
