Evaluating community development

Authors

  • Jade Maloney ARTD Consultants
  • Ruby Leahy Gatfield ARTD Consultants

Abstract

Community development initiatives are by their very nature iterative and emergent. At the start, it is not clear what they will look like, how they will be delivered, or even what outcomes they will aim to achieve. Conversations between engaged community members shape understandings, intentions and actions, additionally, outcomes are affected by interdependencies. However, with governments increasingly focused on accountability, community organisations receiving government funding are being required to evaluate their community development initiatives – reporting on their effectiveness and outcomes. Community development theorists and practitioners have raised concerns about the appropriateness of this expectation. Indeed, traditional formative and summative evaluation are not well-suited to community development. However, alternative approaches to evaluation have evolved as evaluators have grappled with their role in empowering communities to take ownership of evaluation and in supporting interventions into complex, adaptive systems. Developmental evaluation is one such approach. In a developmental evaluation, the evaluator facilitates data-based reflection and decision-making to support the ongoing development of an initiative. A case study of the national Dementia Friendly Communities program evaluation illustrates how a developmental evaluation approach has supported a community development initiative in practice and highlights what is required for this to work.

Author Biographies

Jade Maloney, ARTD Consultants

ARTD Partner

Ruby Leahy Gatfield, ARTD Consultants

Senior Consultant, ARTD Consultants

References

Alzheimer’s Disease International. (undated). Dementia Friendly Communities – Key Principles. Retrieved from https://www.alz.co.uk/adi/pdf/dfc-principles.pdf

Brandon, P.R., & Singh. J.M. (2009). The strength of the methodological warrants for the findings of research on program evaluation use. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3), pp. 123–157.

Caracelli, V. (2000). Evaluation use at the threshold of the twenty-first century. In V.J. Caracelli & H. Preskill (Eds.), The Expanding Scope of Evaluation Use. New Directions for Evaluation, pp. 88, 99–110.

Campbell, D., Pyett, P., & McCarthy, L. (2007). Community development interventions to improve Aboriginal health: Building an evidence base. Health Sociology Review, 16, pp. 304-31

Chinman, M., Hunter, S. B., Ebener, P., Paddock, S. M., Stillman, L., Imm, P., & Wandersman, A. (2008). The getting to outcomes demonstration and evaluation: an illustration of the prevention support system. American journal of community psychology, 41(3-4), 206-24.

Gamble, J. (2008). A Developmental Evaluation Primer. JW McConnell Family Foundation. Retrieved from http://vibrantcanada.ca/files/developmental_evaluation_primer_1.pdf

Gilchrist, A., & Taylor, M. (2016). The Short Guide to Community Development. Bristol University Press.

Epstein, I., Tripodi, T., & Fellin, P. (1973). Community Development Programmes and their Evaluation. Community Development Journal, 8(1), pp. 28-36.

Fetterman, D. (2017). Transformative Empowerment Evaluation and Freirean Pedagogy: Alignment with an Emancipatory Tradition. New Directions for Evaluation (155): 111–126.

Fetterman, D.M., Rodriguez-Campos, L., & Zukowksi, A.P. (2018). Collaborative, Participatory and Empowerment Evaluation. The Guilford Press, New York.

Fetterman, D. (2015). Introduction: History and Overview. In Fetterman, D., Kaftarian, S.J. and Wandersman, A. (eds).

Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment, Evaluation Capacity Building, and Accountability, Second Edition. SAGE Publications Inc., USA.

Fetterman, D., Kaftarian, S.J., & Wandersman, A. (2015). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment, Evaluation Capacity Building, and Accountability, Second Edition. SAGE Publications Inc., USA.

Funnel, S.C., & Rogers, P.J. (2011). Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, UK.

Kenny, S. (2007). Developing Communities for the Future (3rd ed.). South Melbourne: Thompson

Kenny, S. (2002). Evaluation and Community Development: Mantras, challenges and dilemmas. Paper presented at the 2002 Australasian Evaluation Society International Conference. Retrieved from https://www.aes.asn.au/images/stories/files/conferences/2002/papers/Kenny.pdf

Kretzmann, J., & McKnight, J.P. (1996). Assets‐based community development. National Civic Review, 85(4), pp. 23–29.

Labonte, R. (1993). Community Development and Partnerships. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 84, pp. 237–40.

Liket, K., Rey-Garcia, M., & Maas, K E. (2014). Why Aren't Evaluations Working and What to Do About It: A Framework for Negotiating Meaningful Evaluation in Non-profits. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(2), pp. 171-188.

Maloney, J. (2018). Evaluation What’s the Use? Evaluation Journal of Australasia.

McKegg, K. (2014). Kate discusses Developmental Evaluation. Collective Impact 2014 Conference. The Knowledge Institute. Retrieved from https://knowledgeinstitute.co.nz/2015/10/02/video-kate-discusses-developmental-evaluation/

Patton, M.Q., & Cabaj, M. (2015). Developmental Evaluation: Principles in Practice. Tamarack: An Institute for Community Engagement. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKyCn2NSgMQ

Patton, M.Q., McKegg, K., & Wehipeihana, N. (2015). Developmental Evaluation Exemplars: Principles in Practice. Guilford Press, USA.

Patton, M.Q. (2017). Principles-Focused Evaluation: The GUIDE. Guilford Publications, US.

Patton, M.Q. (2011). Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. Guilford Publications, USA.

Patton, M.Q. (2008). Utilization-Focused Evaluation. 4th Edition. SAGE Publications Inc. US.

Patton, M.Q. (2007). Developmental Evaluation: Evaluation for the Way We Work. The Nonprofit Quarterly, pp. 28-33.

Rawsthorne, M., & Howard, A. (2011). Working with Communities. Common Ground Publishing, Champaign, Illinois.

Peter, H., Rossi, P.H., Lipsey, M.W., & Freeman, H.E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 7th Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc.

NSW Service for the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Torture and Trauma Survivors (STARTTS). (2012). Community Development Evaluation Manual. STARTTS. Carramar, Australia.

Wadsworth Y. (1991). Everyday Evaluation on the Run. Action Research Issues Associated Inc. Melbourne.

Wandersman, A. (2015). Getting to Outcomes. In Fetterman, D., Kaftarian, S.J. and Wandersman, A. (eds). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment, Evaluation Capacity Building, and Accountability, Second Edition. SAGE Publications Inc., USA.

Wandersman, A., & Snell-Johns, J. (2005). Empowerment evaluation: Clarity, dialogue, and growth. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), pp. 421–428.

Weiss, C.H. (2002). What to do until the Random Assigner Comes. In Mosteller, F.F. and Boruch, R.F. (eds). Evidence Matters: Randomized Trials in Education Research. Brookings Institution Press.

Weiss, C.H. (1998). Chapter 1: Setting the Scene. Evaluation: Methods for Studying Programs and Polices. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.

Westoby, P., & Dowling, G. (2013). Theory and Practice of Dialogical Community Development - International Perspectives. Routledge, New York.

Vo, A.T., & Christie, C.A. (2015). Advancing research on evaluation through the study of context. In P.R. Brandon (Ed.), Research on Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 148, pp. 43–55.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-12