Interrogating the operation of empathy in social work with noncitizens
Abstract
Based on interviews I conducted with social workers in Canada, this article offers a critique of empathy as a foundation of good social work. More specifically, I examine how empathic feelings produce the social worker as a knowing, moral and innocent subject in their work with noncitizens. Drawing on critical theories of affect and emotions that reconceptualise feelings as social practice, I examine how empathy facilitates proximity with and knowledge production about noncitizens among social workers. I attend to various historical lines of empathic feeling among differently positioned social workers and trace the concrete ways in which the feeling of empathy circulates and ‘sticks’, as social workers navigate exclusionary practices towards noncitizens. I argue that empathy, while imagined as an affective entry to minimising the professional–client distance, could instead function to secure social workers’ sense of innocence and morality, confirming their professional identity as facilitated by the script of whiteness.
References
Ahmed, S. (2000). Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-coloniality. London, England: Routledge.
Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117-139.
Badwall, H. (2013). Can I be a good social worker? Racialized workers narrate their experiences with racism in every day practice (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Ontario Institute of Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Bartky, S. L. (1996). Sympathy and solidarity: One a tightrope with Scheler. In D. T. Meyers (Ed.), Feminists Rethink the Self (pp. 177-198). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Canadian Association of Social Workers. (1995). Standards of practice in social work. Retrieved from https://www.casw-acts.ca/en/canadian-association-social-workers-standardspractice-social-work-1995
Chapman, C. (2011). Resonance, intersectionality, and reflexivity in critical pedagogy (and research methodology). Social Work Education: The International Journal, 30(7), 723- 744.
Coleman, D. (2006). White civility: The literary project of English Canada. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Davis, M. H. (2004). Empathy: Negotiating the border between self and other. In L. Z. Tiedens & C. W. Leach (Eds.), Studies in emotion and social interaction: The social life of emotions (pp. 19-42). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Eriksson, K., & Englander, M. (2017). Empathy in social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 53(4), 607-621.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/ knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 109-133). New York, NY: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (2003). The subject and power. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 126-144). New York, NY: The New Press.
Gerdes, K. E. (2011). Empathy, sympathy, and pity: 21st century definitions and implications for practice and research. Journal of Social Service Research, 37, 230-241.
Gerdes, K. E., & Segal, E. (2009). A social work model of empathy. Advances in Social Work, 10(2), 114-127.
Gregorio, M. D., & Merolli, J. L. (2016). Introduction: Affective citizenship and the politics of identity, control, resistance. Citizenship Studies, 20(8), 933-942.
Healy, K. (2000). Social work practices: Contemporary perspectives on change. London, England: Sage Publications.
Hemmings, C. (2011). Why stories matter: The political grammar of feminist theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Heron, B. (2007). Desire for development: Whiteness, gender and the helping imperative. Waterloo, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Ingram, R. (2012). Locating emotional intelligence at the heart of social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 43(5), 987-1004.
Jafri, B. (2012). Privilege vs. complicity: People of colour and settler colonialism. Indigenizing the academy and Indigenous education. Retrieved from https://www.ideasidees.ca/blog/privilege-vs-complicity-people-colour-and-settler-colonialism
Johnstone, M. (2016). The pervasive presence of the discourse of white civility in early Canadian social work in immigration services (1900–1920). British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1724-1740.
LaCapra, D. (2001). Writing history, writing trauma. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lamble, S. (2008). Retelling racialized violence, remaking white innocence: The politics of interlocking oppressions in transgender day of remembrance. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 5(1), 24-42.
Lee, E. O. J., & Ferrer, I. (2014). Examining social work as a Canadian settler colonial project: Colonial continuities of circles of reform, civilization, and in/visibility. Journal of Critical Anti-Oppressive Social Inquiry, 1, 1-20.
Nobe-Ghelani, C. (2019). Tracing invisible borders of Canadian citizenship: Critical analysis of Canadian social work with noncitizens (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://yorkspace.library.yorku.ca/xmlui/handle/10315/36298
O'Connell, A. (2013). The deserving and non-deserving races: Colonial intersections of social welfare history in Ontario. Intersectionalities: A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis, Research, Polity, and Practice, 2, 1-23.
Pedwell, C. (2014). Affective relations: The transnational politics of empathy. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
Pedwell, C. (2016). De-colonising empathy: Thinking affect transnationally. Samyukta: A Journal of Women's Studies, 16(1), 27-49.
Pon, G. (2009). Cultural competency as new racism: An ontology of forgetting. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 20(1). 59-71.
Sakamoto, I. (2007). An anti-oppressive approach to cultural competence. Canadian Social Work Review, 24(1). 105-114.
Spelman, E. V. (1997). Fruits of sorrow: Framing our attention to suffering. Boston, ME: Beacon Press.
Wong, R. (2003). Deconstructing culture in cultural competence: Dissenting voices from Asian-Canadian practitioners. Canadian Social Work Review, 20(2). 149-167.
