Rethinking Vulnerability: Language, Power and Social Work

Authors

  • Ben Carl Bakker University of Sydney

Abstract

The term ‘vulnerability’ has risen to prominence in social work and social policy in the 21st century, understood generally as a popular signifier of clients, groups and communities that require ‘intervention’. Proportionate to the magnitude of its use, critical engagement with the definition, function and ramifications of the term’s meaning has been significantly lacking in social work scholarship. This literature review engages specifically with the instability of the many meanings held within ‘vulnerability’, aiming to broaden an understanding of the term’s diverse constructions. The research findings position vulnerability as a complex and critical category, which is both receptive and active within the contexts it emerges. Consequently, the findings orient social work away from a generalised, transferrable definition, and instead towards embedding a process of critical deconstruction and reconstruction when using and responding to ‘vulnerability’. Finally, it is suggested that a greater appreciation for the word’s contested terrain will enhance social justice work in the areas of labelling and oppression.

Author Biography

  • Ben Carl Bakker, University of Sydney
    Social Work Student

References

Arstein-Kerslake, Anna (2019) “Gendered Denials: Vulnerability Created by Barriers to Legal Capacity for Women and Disabled Women.” International journal of law and psychiatry 66 (2019): 101501–101501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101501

Australian Association of Social Workers. (2010). Code of Ethics. Retrieved on 10th July 2020 from https://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/1201

Barker, R. (2017). The social work dictionary 6th edition. Social Work Research, 41(2), 119.

Barusch, A. (2011). Disaster, Vulnerability, and Older Adults: Toward a Social Work Response. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 54(4), 347–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2011.582821

Bauer, P., & Wiezorek, C. (2016). “Vulnerable Families”: Reflections on a Difficult Category. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 6(4), 11–28.

Beckett, A. (2006). Citizenship and vulnerability: disability and issues of social and political engagement. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501294

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Penguin Books

Brown, K. (2012). Re-moralising “Vulnerability.” People Place and Policy Online, 6(1), 41–53.

https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.0006.0001.0005

Brown, K. (2017). The Many Faces of Vulnerability. Social Policy and Society, 16(3), 497–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746416000610

Butler, J. (2016). Rethinking Vulnerability and Resistance. In Butler, J., Gambetti, Z., & Sabsay, L. (n.d.). Vulnerability in resistance. Duke University Press. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.sydney.edu.au/10.1215/9780822373490

Christopoulou, N., & Lazaridis, G. (2012). Vulnerability, silence and pathways to resistance: The case of migrant women in Greece. In Regulating the International Movement of Women: From Protection to Control (pp. 92–110). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818381

Dewees, M. (1999). The Application of Social Constructionist Principles to Teaching Social Work Practice in Mental Health. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 19(1-2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v19n01_04

Dunn, M., Clare, I., & Holland, A. (2008). To empower or to protect? Constructing the “vulnerable adult” in English law and public policy. Legal Studies, 28(2), 234–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2008.00085.x

Ewijk, H. (2018). Social Complexity and Vulnerability. In Ewijk, H. (n.d.). Complexity and social work, (pp. 1-32). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109275

Fawcett, B. (2009). Vulnerability: Questioning the certainties in social work and health. International Social Work, 52(4), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872809104251

Ferrarese, E. (2016). Vulnerability and Critical Theory. Brill Publishing https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004367906

Fineman, M. (2010). The vulnerable subject and the responsive state. Emory Law Journal, 60(2), 251–275. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1694740

Fineman, M. (2010). The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. In Transcending the Boundaries of Law: Generations of Feminism and Legal Theory (pp. 161–175). Routledge. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1131407

Fook, J. (2002). Critical deconstruction and reconstruction. In Social work: critical theory and practice (pp. 89–102). SAGE.

Guo, W., & Tsui, M. (2010). From resilience to resistance: A reconstruction of the strengths perspective in social work practice. International Social Work, 53(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872809355391

Hollomotz, A. (2009). Beyond “Vulnerability”: An Ecological Model Approach to Conceptualizing Risk of Sexual Violence against People with Learning Difficulties. British Journal of Social Work, 39(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm091

Hunter, R. (2011). Constructing vulnerabilities and managing risk: State responses to forced marriage . In Fitzgerald, S. (n.d.). Regulating the International Movement of Women From Protection to Control. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818381

Jordan, J. (2008). Valuing Vulnerability: New Definitions of Courage. Women & Therapy, 31(2-4), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703140802146399

Mellini, L., Poglia Mileti, F., & Villani, M. (2018). Resistance to vulnerability. Terrains & Travaux, 33(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.3917/tt.033.0153

Munro, V., & Scoular, J. (2012). Abusing Vulnerability? Contemporary Law and Policy Responses to Sex Work in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies, 20(3), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9213-x

O’ Higgins, A. (2012). Vulnerability and agency: Beyond an irreconcilable dichotomy for social service providers working with young refugees in the UK. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2012(136), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20012

Petherbridge, D. (2016). What’s Critical about Vulnerability? Rethinking Interdependence, Recognition, and Power. Hypatia, 31(3), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12250

Pierson, J., & Thomas, M. (2010). Dictionary of social work. Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education.

Virokannas, E., Liuski, S., & Kuronen, M. (2020). The contested concept of vulnerability - a literature review. European Journal of Social Work, 23(2), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1508001

Wakeham, M. (2018). A Dictionary of Social Work and Social Care (2nd edition). Reference Reviews, 32(6), 10–10.

Wisner, B. (2016). Vulnerability as Concept, Model, Metric, and Tool. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science. Oxford University Press https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.25

Yeo, R. (2020). The regressive power of labels of vulnerability affecting disabled asylum seekers in the UK. Disability & Society, 35(4), 676–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1639688

Zarowsky, C., Haddad, S., & Nguyen, V. (2013). Beyond “vulnerable groups”: contexts and dynamics of vulnerability. Global Health Promotion, 20, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975912470062

Downloads

Published

2021-06-28

Issue

Section

Student edition 2021