Rethinking Care in Social Work: An Argument for Reciprocity-Oriented Practice
Keywords:Care, Reciprocity, Social Work
Both social workers and clients benefit from integrating an ethic of reciprocity into our caring relationships with both individuals and communities. This article unpacks the concept of care, arguing that its ubiquity and complexity allows for it to be imbued with many meanings. Care is predominately understood through a neoliberal lens within Australian formal services, which reinforces the carer-dependant binary and contributes to the capacity for care to be demeaning, oppressive and paternalistic.
We introduce the concept of reciprocity, which allows for mutuality within care relationships and is truer to models of relationality within First Nations cultures. Invoking reciprocity in social work practice is a useful tool to aid social workers in resistance against oppressive structures and the sustenance of meaningful relationships with clients. Social workers can engage in reciprocity-oriented practice in a number of ways, including through mutual relationships, the co-production of knowledge, and community-based work.
Adams, V., & Sharp, R. (2013). Reciprocity in caring labor: Nurses’ work in residential aged care in Australia. Feminist Economics, 19(2), 100-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2013.767982
Alexander. C., & Charles, G. (2009). Caring, mutuality and reciprocity in social worker-client relationships: Rethinking principles of practice. Journal of Social Work, 9(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017308098420
Beresford, P., & Carr, S. (2012). Conclusion: The personal is still political. In P. Beresford & S. Carr (Eds.), Social care, service users and user involvement (pp. 265-271). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Bhandary, A. (2020). Interpersonal reciprocity: An antiracist feminist virtue for liberal care arrangements. In A. Bhandary & A. R. Baehr (Eds.), Caring for Liberalism: Dependency and Liberal Political Theory (pp. 145-167), Routledge.
Charon, R. (2014). Narrative reciprocity. Hastings Center Report, 44(s1), S21–S24. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.264
Dannefer, D., Stein P., Siders, R., & Shura Patterson, R. (2008). Is that all there is? The concept of care and the dialectic of critique. Journal of Aging Studies, 22, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2007.12.017
Family Matters. (2021). The Family Matters report 2021 executive summary: Measuring trends to turn the tide on the over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in out-of-home care in Australia. https://www.familymatters.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/FamilyMattersReport2021-Executive-Summary-LR.pdf
Fine, M. (2004). Renewing the social vision of care. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 39(3), 217-232.
Fine, M., & Glendinning, C. (2005). Dependence, independence or inter- dependence? Revisiting the concepts of ‘care’ and ‘dependency’. Ageing & Society, 25(4), 601-621. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X05003600
Fisher, B., & Tronto, J. (1990). Toward a feminist theory of caring. In E. K. Abel & M. K. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives (pp. 35- 63). State University of New York Press.
Healy, K. (2015). Becoming a trustworthy profession: Doing better than doing good. Australian Social Work, s1, 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2014.973550
Hughes, M. E. (2017). Where is the love? Meditations on a critical ethics of care and love in social work. In B. Pease, A. Vreugdenhil, & S. Stanford (Eds.), Critical ethics of care in social work: Transforming the politics and practices of caring (pp. 197-206). Routledge.
Loughrey, G. (2020). A custodial ethic: An Aboriginal way of wholeness and reciprocity. Zadok Perspectives, 148, 4–6. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.477972997341798
Martin, K., & Mirraboopa, B. (2003). Ways of Knowing, Being and Doing: A theoretical framework and methods for Indigenous and Indigenist re‐search. Journal of Australian Studies, 27(76), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443050309387838
Pease, B, Vreugdenhil, A., & Stanford, S. (2017). Towards a critical ethics of care in social work. In B. Pease, A. Vreugdenhil, & S. Stanford (Eds.), Critical ethics of care in social work: Transforming the politics and practices of caring (pp. 3- 15). Routledge.
Pelto-Piri, V., Engström, K., & Engström, I. (2013). Paternalism, autonomy and reciprocity: Ethical perspectives in encounters with patients in psychiatric in- patient care. BMC Med Ethics, (14)49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-49
Phillips, R. (2018). Emancipatory social work with older people: Challenging students to overcome the limitations of ageism and institutional oppression. Social Work and Policy Studies: Social Justice, Practice and Theory, 1(001).
Regev-Messalem, S. (2022). A new currency for paid care: Circles of reciprocity. Gender, Work & Organization, 29(4), 1164-1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12824
Törrönen, M., Munn-Giddings, C., & Tarkiainen, L. (2017). Reciprocal social work and social policy: Conclusions. In M. Törrönen, C. Munn-Giddings, & L. Tarkiainen (Eds.), Reciprocal relationships and well-being: Implications for social work and social policy (pp. 176-180). Routledge.
Yeandle, S., Chou, Y., Larkin, M., & Milne, A. (2017) Care and caring: Interdisciplinary perspectives on a societal issue of global signiﬁcance, International Journal of Care and Caring, 1(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1332/239788217X14866278171183