Power of the Powerless – Fighting the Good Fight Against Double Oppression
Keywords:
double-oppression, law, systemic barriers, marginalized communitiesAbstract
Double Oppression (DO) is a phenomenon that encompasses the experience of individuals facing intersecting forms of oppression based on various identities, such as race, gender, sexuality, and class. DO arises from the interconnectedness of societal structures and systems of oppression, with racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and poverty being interrelated factors. Individuals who identify with multiple marginalized identities may face compounded forms of oppression, resulting in distinct experiences and social disadvantages. While the legal response to DO is essential, it poses unique challenges due to its intersectional nature. Law may also perpetuate or exacerbate existing forms of oppression.
This paper argues that legal frameworks and policies must consider the specific needs and experiences of affected individuals and groups. Inadequate consideration of intersectionality can result in insufficient legal remedies that fail to address the complexity of intersecting discrimination. Effective legal strategies require a comprehensive approach that acknowledges the distinct experiences of marginalized communities. This includes ensuring access to legal protections and resources, funding legal aid services, promoting community-based legal advocacy, and addressing systemic barriers to legal resources. Collaboration between legal experts and social justice advocates, as well as ongoing engagement with impacted communities, is crucial in developing tailored legal strategies. This paper advocates for a holistic approach that acknowledges the empowerment of marginalized individuals in their resistance against oppression.
References
Adamu, F. L. (1999). A double-edged sword: Challenging women’s oppression within Muslim society in Northern Nigeria. Gender & Development, 7(1), 56–61.
Ajele, G., & McGill, J. (2020). Intersectioality in Law and Legal Context. Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF).
Aljumah, S. (2022). Unjust Laws, Moral Oppression, and Resistance in Selected Works of Harriet Jacobs, Kate Chopin, Richard Wright, and Tennessee Williams. Morgan State University.
Bartky, S. L. (2015). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Routledge.
Boudreau, C., MacKenzie, S. A., & Simmons, D. J. (2022). Police violence and public opinion after George Floyd: How the Black Lives Matter movement and endorsements affect support for reforms. Political Research Quarterly, 75(2), 497–511.
Burnette, C. E., & Figley, C. R. (2016). Historical oppression, resilience, and transcendence: Can a holistic framework help explain violence experienced by indigenous people? Social Work, 1–8.
Burns, T. (2011). Structcural Discrimination: Cultural, Institutional and Interactional Mechanisms of the “European Dilemma.”
Carastathis, A. (2014). The concept of intersectionality in feminist theory. Philosophy Compass, 9(5), 304–314.
Choudhry, S. (2000). Distribution vs. Recognition: The Case of Antidiscrimination Laws. George Mason Law Review, 9, 145.
Coaston, J. (2019). The intersectionality wars. Salisbury.Edu.
Coen-Sanchez, K., Ebenso, B., El-Mowafi, I. M., Berghs, M., Idriss-Wheeler, D., & Yaya, S. (2022). Repercussions of overturning Roe v. Wade for women across systems and beyond borders. In Reproductive Health (Vol. 19, Issue 1, pp. 1–5). BioMed Central.
Collins, P., McLaughlin, A., Higginbotham, E., Henderson, D., Tickamyer, A., MacDonald, V.-M., Gatta, M., Manuel, T., Jones-Deweever, A., & Schram, S. (2009). Emerging intersections: Race, class, and gender in theory, policy, and practice. Rutgers University Press.
Daigle, M., Duffy, D. N., & Castañeda, D. L. (2022). Abortion access and Colombia’s legacy of civil war: Between reproductive violence and reproductive governance. International Affairs, 98(4), 1423–1448.
De Beco, G. (2017). Protecting the invisible: An intersectional approach to international human rights law. Human Rights Law Review, 17(4), 633–663.
Dube, M. W. (1999). Searching for the lost needle: Double colonization & postcolonial African feminisms. Studies in World Christianity, 5(2), 213–228.
Feinstein, R. A. (2018). When rape was legal: The untold history of sexual violence during slavery. Routledge.
Fox, M. J. (2016). “Priorities of Arrangement” or a “Hierarchy of Oppressions?”: Perspectives on Intersectionality in Knowledge Organization. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, 43(5), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-5-373
Fradella, H. F. (2023). How State Courts Apply Lawrence v. Texas in Civil Contexts: A Mixed-Methods Content Analysis of Two Decades of Cases. Tul. JL & Sexuality, 32, 1.
Friedman, R., & Jillions, A. (2015). The pitfalls and politics of holistic justice. Global Policy, 6(2), 141–150.
Fundraisers: Occupational Outlook Handbook: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved November 4, 2023, from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/business-and-financial/fundraisers.htm
Hagai, E. B., Annechino, R., Young, N., & Antin, T. (2020). Intersecting Sexual Identities, Oppressions, and Social Justice Work: Comparing LGBTQ Baby Boomers to Millennials Who Came of Age After the 1980s AIDS Epidemic. The Journal of Social Issues, 76(4), 971–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12405
Hankivsky, O., & Jordan-Zachery, J. S. (2019). Introduction: Bringing intersectionality to public policy. The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy, 1–28.
Jefferson, K., Neilands, T. B., & Sevelius, J. (2013). Transgender women of color: Discrimination and depression symptoms. Ethnicity and Inequalities in Health and Social Care, 6(4), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/EIHSC-08-2013-0013
Jenkins, J. C. (2006). Nonprofit organizations and political advocacy. The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 2, 307–331.
Jones, J. R. (2021). The Experience of Conflicting Identities amongst African American Law Enforcement Officers [Ph.D., Walden University]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2593623117/abstract/19D38D8A99D8427APQ/1
Joseph, R. A. (n.d.). 8. Abortion Rights: Fight for Women’s Right on Her Own Body. Vimarsh, 59.
Kochhar, R. (2023, March 1). The Enduring Grip of the Gender Pay Gap. Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/03/01/the-enduring-grip-of-the-gender-pay-gap/
Legal-Miller, A. (2022). Race, Policing, and Black Lives Matter. In Developments in American Politics 9 (pp. 33–48). Springer.
MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.
Mercer, D., Paludi, M. I., Mills, J. H., & Mills, A. J. (2015). Intersectionality at the intersection. The Oxford Handbook of Diversity in Organizations, 435–453.
Mookherjee, D., & Png, I. P. L. (1995). Corruptible Law Enforcers: How Should They Be Compensated? The Economic Journal, 105(428), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2235324
Morris, P. M. (2002). The Capabilities Perspective: A Framework for Social Justice. Families in Society, 83(4), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.16
Moussa, J. (2011). 1. The Human Rights Of Women In A Specific Cultural Context. In Competing Fundamentalisms and Egyptian Women’s Family Rights (pp. 11–31). Brill Nijhoff.
Murnen, S. K., & Don, B. P. (2012). Body image and gender roles. Encyclopedia of Body Image and Human Appearance, 1, 128–134.
Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-Thinking Intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.4
Nejat, J., & Jamili, L. B. (2014). Double colonization in John Maxwell Coetzee’s disgrace. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 3(1), 40–44.
Nicholson, L. J. (1997). The second wave: A reader in feminist theory (Vol. 1). Psychology Press.
Price, J. H., & Payton, E. (2017). Implicit Racial Bias and Police Use of Lethal Force: Justifiable Homicide or Potential Discrimination? Journal of African American Studies, 21(4), 674–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-017-9383-3
Remedios, J. D., & Snyder, S. H. (2018). Intersectional oppression: Multiple stigmatized identities and perceptions of invisibility, discrimination, and stereotyping. Journal of Social Issues, 74(2), 265–281.
Robinson, R. K., & Frost, D. M. (2023). Marriage equality & intersectionality. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy.
Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups. (n.d.). Retrieved November 4, 2023, from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/raceindicators/
Strebin, A. M. (2023). The Politics of Abortion in France and the United States: A Case Study on the Laws, Legislation, Activism, and Advocacy that Determined Abortion Laws Today.
Strunk, K. K., Locke, L. A., Martin, G. L., Strunk, K. K., Locke, L. A., & Martin, G. L. (2017). Black Resistance. Oppression and Resistance in Southern Higher and Adult Education: Mississippi and the Dynamics of Equity and Social Justice, 111–136.
Stuart, O. (1993). Double oppression: An appropriate starting-point?
Täuber, S., & Moughalian, C. (2022). Collective system‐supporting inaction: A conceptual framework of privilege maintenance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(7), 1128–1142.
Valdés, T. (2019). Being female and poor: A double oppression. In Popular Culture in Chile (pp. 97–112). Routledge.
Van Bussel, T. (2014). Feminism is for everybody, except when it isn’t: Contemporary gender theory and oppression in development. Undercurrent Journal: Vol. 10, Issue 2 (Fall/Winter 2014)[Color], 58.
Wang, J., Anand, S., Li, H., & Du, W. (2022). Marriage equality for everyone? The business case for same sex marriage legislation. Journal of Business Research, 148, 190–202.
Wu, Y. (2014). Race/ethnicity and perceptions of the police: A comparison of White, Black, Asian and Hispanic Americans. Policing and Society, 24(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.784288
Young, I. M. (2014). Five faces of oppression. Rethinking Power, 174–195.
