Medical students' exposure to, knowledge and perceptions of telehealth technology: is our future workforce ready to embrace telehealth service delivery?


  • Sabrina Winona Pit Western Sydney University University of Sydney University Centre for Rural Health
  • Jannine Bailey Western Sydney University School of Medicine Bathurst Rural Clinical School


Background: Having a workforce ready to embrace telehealth is key to improving healthcare access and equity in rural Australia. Known barriers to uptake amongst health professionals include: liability/law issues; traditional attitudes; business models; time constraints; and lack of workforce support, incentives, billing, funding, information technology (IT) skills, and patient rapport. Whether medical students share the same perspectives is currently unclear. This study sought to explore medical students’ knowledge of, exposure to and attitudes towards telehealth.

Methods: Focus groups were conducted upon completion of a 12-month rural placement. Questions focused on students’ exposure to and experiences with telehealth, their perspectives on those experiences, their desire to learn more about telehealth, and their perspectives on who should drive the implementation of telehealth services. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes.

Results: Exposure to telehealth consults varied and appeared ad hoc. Overall interest in telehealth appeared to be low, but the students recognised its value in specific circumstances, such as for scripts, complicated/rare cases and to reduce social isolation for patients and doctors. Students identified the following as key barriers to telehealth use: legal/liability issues, technology, organisational issues, patient rapport, potential lower quality of care, lack of confidence in clinical ability, and a preference for ‘face-to-face’ medicine. Overall, students felt that rural, rather than urban-based, clinicians need to drive the telehealth agenda and further telehealth skills training and guidelines are required. Some students felt that some urban doctors used telehealth to expand their own patient base.

Conclusion: Medical students’ ‘real life’ experience influences their current knowledge and perceptions of telehealth, which in turn has implications for the future of telehealth work and education of the workforce. Enhancing telehealth education and training during medical school training through increased exposure, experience and capability building will make medical students more workforce ready, so they are able to develop and work in new models of telehealth care.


Article submitted: 10/10/2018

Article accepted: 18/11/2018

Publish date: 17/12/2018

Author Biographies

Sabrina Winona Pit, Western Sydney University University of Sydney University Centre for Rural Health

Dr Sabrina Pit  Work | Health | Ageing

| Lead Academic - Clinical and Educational Research| Workforce Research Stream Leader
University Centre for Rural Health


Winner Western Sydney University Teaching Excellence Award 2017

Winner Patient Safety Category. Northern NSW Local Health District Quality Awards. 2018.  Hall, Robertson, Pit, Rolfe, Pascoe, Passey, Mackenzie, Murray,

Jannine Bailey, Western Sydney University School of Medicine Bathurst Rural Clinical School

Senior Lecturer


AMSA (Australian Medical Student Association) 2016, Policy Document. Rural Training Pathways Policy, viewed 3 April 2018

Barlow, M 2013, Big Data Culture Gap: Technology Advancing More Quickly Than People and Processes, O’Reilly, viewed 14 November 2018,

Boyers, LN, Schultz, A, Baceviciene, R, Blaney, S, Marvi, N, Dellavalle, RP & Dunnick, CA 2015, ‘Teledermatology as an educational tool for teaching dermatology to residents and medical students’, Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 21, pp. 312–314,

Bradbury, J, Nancarrow, S, Avila, C, Pit, S, Potts, R, Doran, F, & Freed, G 2017, ‘Actual availability of appointments at general practices in regional New South Wales, Australia’, Australian Family Physician, vol. 46, pp. 321–325.

Bradford, NK, Caffery, LJ & Smith, AC 2016, ‘Telehealth services in rural and remote Australia: a systematic review of models of care and factors influencing success and sustainability’, Rural and remote health, vol. 16 (3808).

Braun, V & Clarke, V 2006, ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative research in psychology, vol. 3, pp. 77–101.

Brodribb, W, Zadoroznyj, M & Martin, B 2016, ‘How do rural placements affect urban-based Australian junior doctors’ perceptions of working in a rural area?’, Australian Health Review, vol. 40, pp. 655–660.

Brunner, M, McGregor, D, Keep, M, Janssen, A, Spallek, H, Quinn, D, Jones, A, Tseris, E, Yeung, W, Togher, L & Solman, A 2018, ‘An eHealth Capabilities Framework for Graduates and Health Professionals: Mixed-Methods Study’, Journal of medical Internet research, vol. 20. e10229.

Bull, TP, Dewar, AR, Malvey, DM & Szalma, JL 2016, ‘Considerations for the telehealth systems of tomorrow: an analysis of student perceptions of telehealth technologies’, JMIR Medical Education, vol. 2, e11.

Department of Health 2012, Specialist video consultations under Medicare. Questions and Answers, viewed online 1 October 2018,

Department of Health 2015, Telehealth, viewed online 1 October 2018,

Department of Health 2016. Fact Sheet –Telehealth Quarterly Statistics update on MBS Online, August 2016.pdf, viewed online 1 October 2018,

Department of Health 2017, Telehealth psychological services for people in rural areas, viewed online 3 April 2018,

Department of Health 2018a, Better Access Telehealth Services for people in rural and remote areas, viewed online 1 October 2018,

Department of Health 2018b, Better Access Telehealth initiative for rural and remote patients. Frequently Asked Questions, viewed online 1 October 2018$File/Better%20Access%20Telehealth%20FAQ%20-%201%20September%202018.pdf

Department of Human Services 2018, Medicare Australia Statistics, Statistics, Medicare Item Reports, viewed online 1 October 2018

Glinkowski, W, Pawłowska, K and Kozłowska, L 2013, ‘Telehealth and telenursing perception and knowledge among university students of nursing in Poland’, Telemedicine and E-health, vol. 19, pp. 523–529.

Guest, G & Namey, E 2017, Exploring the parameters of ‘it depends’ for estimating the rate of data saturation in qualitative inquiry, viewed online 1 October 2018,

Guest, G, Namey, E & McKenna, K 2017, ‘How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes’, Field methods, vol. 29, pp. 3–22.

Isaac, V, Pit, SW & McLachlan, CS, 2018, ‘Self-efficacy reduces the impact of social isolation on medical student’s rural career intent’, BMC medical education, vol. 18, p. 42.

MBS Online 2016, Telehealth Quarterly Statistics Update, viewed online 1 October 2018,

Namey, E 2017, ‘Riddle me this: How many interviews (or focus groups) are enough?’, viewed online 1 October 2018,

Richie, J & Lewis, J 2003, Qualitative Research Practice: a guide for social science students and researchers, SAGE, London

Rienits, H, Teuss, G and Bonney, A 2016, ‘Teaching telehealth consultation skills’, The Clinical Teacher, vol. 13, pp. 119–123.

Smith, T, Cross, M, Waller, S, Chambers, H, Farthing, A, Barraclough, F, Pit, SW, Sutton, K, Muyambi, K, King, S & Anderson, J 2018a, ‘Ruralization of students’ horizons: insights into Australian health professional students’ rural and remote placements’, Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, vol. 11, p. 85,

Smith, T, Sutton, K, Pit, S, Muyambi, K, Terry, D, Farthing, A, Courtney, C & Cross, M 2018b, ‘Health professional students' rural placement satisfaction and rural practice intentions: A national cross‐sectional survey’, Australian Journal of Rural Health, vol. 26, pp. 26–32,

Wade, VA, Eliott, JA and Hiller, JE, 2014 ‘Clinician acceptance is the key factor for sustainable telehealth services’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 24, pp. 682–694.