Sources of Stress and Effective Coping Strategies employed by First Year Exercise Students.

Authors

  • E.S.Louise Faber The University of Queensland

Keywords:

emotion regulation, biomedical science, engagement, academic performance

Abstract

Australian undergraduate students experience higher levels of stress than the general population, in part caused by the adjustment students need to make during their first year of university (Smart, McCabe, Bird, Byrne & Cornish, 2024). Learning to effectively cope with stressors is important for student wellbeing and success, and can improve engagement (Smart et al, 2024; Pekrun & Linnenbrink-Garcia, 2012). The current study aimed to identify sources of stress in first year exercise students, and to determine the relationship between stress regulation strategies, engagement and performance. Consenting first year students undertaking a biomedical science course in an exercise program (n=89) were asked what they found stressful about university, and which strategies they use to regulate these stressors. Responses were subjected to inductive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). Multiple regression was used to examine relationships between frequencies of reported strategies with academic engagement, measured by online learning management system activity, and academic performance in the course. Students described twelve main types of stressors, with the top sources of stress being workload (40%), balancing work and life (38%), assessment pressures (25%), and self-regulation (16%). At the beginning of semester students planned to use more problem-focused strategies to regulate their stress, such as time management, goal setting and study techniques. At the end of semester, students reported using more emotion-focused strategies, such as exercise, meditation practices and work-life balance. Use of multiple coping strategies at the end of semester significantly predicted a higher course grade and more engagement with online lecture content. These findings suggest that employing multiple emotion regulation strategies enhances the student experience and facilitates learning.

 

REFERENCES

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2), 77-101.

Pekrun, R. & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic Emotions and Student Engagement. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 259–282).

Smart, I., McCabe, M., Bird, L. J., Byrne, M. L. & Cornish, K. (2024). Australian university student coping profiles and psychosocial distress: a latent profile analysis. Studies in Higher Education, ahead-of-print, 1–14.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-09