Following up on Scaffolded Physics Laboratory Skills: What Worked, What Didn’t, What’s Next?

Authors

  • Thomas Findlay Dixon University of New South Wales
  • Kate Jackson

Keywords:

Laboratory Skills, Laboratory Instruction, Physics Laboratory

Abstract

This poster is a follow-up to the 2023 ACSME Oral Presentation (Dixon and Moya, 2023) in which the authors presented a new structure for explicitly scaffolding skills within a first year laboratory program for students majoring in physics. This scaffolding was vital to maintain the utility of physics laboratories, as studies have shown that they cannot be relied upon to improve examination scores (Holmes, Olsen, Thomas, & Wieman, 2017) (i.e., they do not reinforce content). Instead, their value to students is in the development of the skillset expected of an experimental physicist.

In the year since the original presentation of this project, the first cohort of students have moved into higher year laboratory physics and begun applying the skills learned in a new context. As preparation for higher year laboratory physics was an explicit goal of this restructuring, feedback was gathered from students on the usefulness of the skills they were taught and how well prepared they felt for the challenges of upper year experimental physics. In this poster, I will discuss the key themes of student feedback, showcase the evolution of the program, and discuss its future directions.

Author Biography

  • Thomas Findlay Dixon, University of New South Wales
    PhD Student - Photonics, UNSW

Downloads

Published

2024-09-09