Critical Perspectives on the Uniform Evidence Law by Andrew Roberts and Jeremy Gans

Abstract

This review essay discusses various aspects of the edited collection of essays on the Uniform Evidence Law (‘UEL’). First, some general observations on the UEL are offered. Second, the chapters on the origins, development and future of the UEL are used to discuss the UEL’s place in Australia and the world. Third, the role of probative value is considered with respect to Andrew Roberts’ chapter. Fourth, David Hamer’s views on tendency and coincidence evidence are critically discussed. Finally, some concluding remarks are offered.