Before the High Court

All Items

• Stare Decisis and Constitutional Guarantees: Commonwealth v Yunupingu

  Ashleigh Barnes

• Rethinking “On Just Terms”: Commonwealth v Yunupingu

  Lael K Weis, Rosalind Dixon

• Finality and Certainty in the Integrated National System of Chapter III Courts: Judge Vasta v Stradford

  Emily Hammond

• Reassessing "Reliance Damages": The High Court Appeal in Cessnock City Council v 123 259 932 Pty Ltd

  David Winterton

  87-102

• What’s in a Name? Fairness and a Reasonable Opportunity: AB v Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission

  Matthew Groves

  525-538

• Planting the Yardstick: The Approach to Mandatory Minimum Sentences and the High Court Appeals in Delzotto and Hurt

  Rohan Balani

  411-422

• Long-Arm Jurisdiction over Foreign Tech Companies “Carrying on Business” Online: Facebook Inc v Australian Information Commissioner

  Michael Douglas

  109-120

• Kept in Suspense: Supervening Illegality in Contract Law and the High Court Appeal in Laundy Hotels (Quarry) Pty Ltd v Dyco Hotels Pty Ltd

  Harrison Simons

  605-618

• Vanderstock v Victoria: Are “True” Consumption Taxes Forbidden to the States by Section 90 of the Australian Constitution?

  Anthony Gray

  591-603

• Aboriginal Identity and Status under the Australian Constitution: Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v Montgomery

  Elisa Arcioni, Kirsty Gover

  137-151

• Liability for Workplace Psychiatric Injury and Vicarious Trauma: Kozarov v Victoria

  Kylie Burns

  575-587

• A “Rational and Humane Criminal Code”? Bell v Tasmania and the Reach of Honest and Reasonable Mistake of Fact

  Andrew Dyer

  379-390

• The Meaning of Academic Freedom: The Significance of Ridd v James Cook University

  Adrienne Stone

  241-258

• Liability for the Publication of Third Party Comments: Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Voller

  David Rolph

  225-240

• The Limits of Fairness and Fact-Finding in Judicial Review: MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

  Serena May

  107-117

• Police Doorknocking in Comparative and Constitutional Perspective: Roy v O’Neill

  Julian R Murphy

  343-352

• Hocking v Director-General of the National Archives of Australia: Can Kerr’s Correspondence with the Queen Be Kept Secret Forever?

  Anne Twomey

  97-108

• He "Came Across as Someone Who Was Telling the Truth": Pell v The Queen

  Andrew Dyer, David Hamer

  109-121

• Lewis v Australian Capital Territory: Valuing Freedom

  Jason NE Varuhas

  123-140

• A Reasonably Reasonable Apprehension of Bias: CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

  Matthew Groves

  383-395

• Discharged Contracts and Quantum Meruit: Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd

  John Eldridge, Timothy Pilkington

  255-264

• Comcare v Banerji: Public Servants and Political Communication

  Kieran Pender

  131-147

• Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Kobelt: Evaluating Statutory Unconscionability in the Cultural Context of an Indigenous Community

  Sharmin Tania, Rachel Yates

  557-569

• Abortion Protests and the Limits of Freedom of Political Communication: Clubb v Edwards; Preston v Avery

  Shireen Morris, Adrienne Stone

  395-409