Learning practices through recursive questionnaires
Keywords:Online Learning, Teaching and Learning Strategies, Assessment Methodologies
Distance education or distance learning (DL) in undergraduate courses is growing considerably in the last decades (Holmes & Reid, 2017) and got even more attention due to the COVID pandemic (Crawford et al., 2020; Baggaley, 2020). Students pursuing distance learning have often suffered from isolation and lack of a learning community, resulting in high dropout rates. In general, students’ engagement depends strongly on the evaluation methods (Holmes, 2018), and they define how students manage their time in study.
Introduction to Physical Sciences 1 (ICF1) is the subject in which this work was developed in a DL course with over 1500 students per semester at CEDERJ (Distance Education Center of the State of Rio de Janeiro). In this work, we modified the method of evaluation of two optional assessments (OA) that was given to the students, whose main goal is to promote the practice, through exercises, of two fundamental contents in physics which students often have doubts and misconceptions from high school: vectors (OA1) and Newton's laws (OA2).
This modification was carried out by implementing a recursive formative online assessment that students can answer as many times as they want until a specified due date. The assessment avoids memorizing the answers to the questions by generating new numerical values for each question and randomly mixing their order in every new attempt. After finishing the questionnaire, students receive immediate feedback to correct their mistakes and try to achieve a better score, in such a way that mistakes can be beneficially used as part of their learning process. Each attempt is recorded and all students’ progress is analyzed using a computational Python code. With this approach, the professor can identify and eventually interact with students who need a higher level of attention before the final exams.
The former OAs were not clearly evaluating the students and helping them to better understand the required subjects. In the old format, comparisons and copying of questions could be used by the students in such a way that created an illusory impression on them that they were understanding the underlying concepts. Thus, there was a lack of correlation between the scores in the OAs and the final scores of the students. Our analysis after the implementation of the recursive questionnaires, shows that students with high scores in the OA have more chances to pass the course, as expected from an exam that correctly evaluates the students’ performance. This methodology is a valuable asset for the students’ learning process, regardless of whether they are in a DL course or a regular face-to-face course, and for the professors to identify patterns that can foresee students’ difficulties with their learning progress, allowing to address specific students in need even in classes with a large number of students.REFERENCES
Baggaley, J. (2020). Educational distancing. Distance Education, 41(4), 582-588. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821609
Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
Holmes, C. M. & Reid, C. (2017). A comparison study of on-campus and online learning outcomes for a research methods course. The Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 9(2), 15. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.7729/92.1182
Holmes, N. (2018). Engaging with assessment: Increasing student engagement through continuous assessment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417723230
Authors who publish with the Proceedings of the International Conference on Physics Education 2022 agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access - http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).
Privacy Statement The names and email addresses entered in the Proceedings of the International Conference on Physics Education 2022 site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.