Tool for assessing the level of critical thinking
Keywords:critical thinking, indicators of critical thinking, physics task
Critical thinking is an important skill which is used every day by people together with other abilities to evaluate and interpret information, choose criteria, make decisions or solve problems. It is essential for life in the 21st century. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD, 2018, s.3) states that schools can prepare students for jobs which have not yet been created, for technologies that have not yet been invented and to solve problems that have not yet been anticipated. There are various definitions of critical thinking available in literature (Stobaugh, 2013; Facione, 1990; Crawford, Mathews, Makinster, & Saul, 2005; Paul & Elder, 2007; Collins & O`Brien, 2003), but many authors agree that critical thinking is the one where higher-level thinking processes are used. Various experts agree that critical thinking is not inherent, and students should have an opportunity to learn how to think critically (Gavora, 1995; Facione, 1990; Kosturková, 2016).INDICATORS OF CRITICAL THINKING AND PHYSICAL TASKS
There were five indicators, which have shown the level of students’ critical thinking in mathematics and science in The Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking Project (Crawford et al., 2005). Adapting them for our uses, we work with the following indicators: formulation of hypothesis; gathering of relevant information and data; analysis and evaluation of gathered information and data; determining of conclusion from the results of analysis and evaluation; stating of arguments which support determined conclusions; self-regulation. For each of these indicators we have prepared physics tasks, in which students have to apply some skills of critical thinking.JUDGEMENTS OF CRITICAL THINKING ON PHYSICS LESSONS
The aim of our investigation was to find out how students could solve our suggested tasks. The survey about correlation between a general test of critical thinking (Assessmentday, 2020) and test with our physics tasks was carried out. As a research sample, 29 participants were chosen. The statistical analysis of the data was carried out using R software. The Spearman correlation coefficient was determined rs = 0,563. This means variables can be considered moderately positively correlated. The suggested tasks may be used to test critical thinking on physics lessons. In this contribution, we will present our test and selected tasks with their evaluation described.ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This paper was elaborated with the support of the projects KEGA no. 013UK-4-2021.REFERENCES
Assessmentday. (2020). Free Critical Thinking Test. Solutions Booklet. Retrieved August 10, 2022, from https://www.assessmentday.co.uk/free/watson-glaser/freetest1/FullTest/Free-Critical-Thinking-Test-Solutions.pdf
Crawford, A., Mathews, S. R., Makinster, J., & Saul, E. W. (2005). Teaching and learning strategies for the thinking classroom. New York: The International Debate Education Association.
Collins, J. W., & O`Brien, N. P. (2003). The Greenwood Dictionary of Education. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Retrieved August 10, 2022, from https://lnk.sk/hlJ8
Gavora, P. (1995). Kritické myslenie – prehľad situácie v zahraničí. In Kolláriková, Z. Výchova ku kritickému mysleniu – teória a prax. Bratislava: Štátny pedagogický ústav.
Kosturková, M. (2016). Rozvoj kritického myslenia žiakov stredných škôl. Prešov : Vydavateľstvo prešovskej university.
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills. Education 2030. Retrieved August 10, 2022, from https://lnk.sk/cit1
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2007). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking. Concepts and Tools. The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Stobaugh, R. (2013). Assessing Critical Thinking in Middle and High School: meeting the common core. New York: Routledge.
Authors who publish with the Proceedings of the International Conference on Physics Education 2022 agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access - http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).
Privacy Statement The names and email addresses entered in the Proceedings of the International Conference on Physics Education 2022 site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.